Screen parcels at portfolio scale — with every conclusion cited to its source.

Pre-screening is manual, slow, and easy to miss.

Counties, DLNR, and state agencies move ground across capital-improvement projects, land acquisitions, and permit pipelines spanning thousands of parcels. Identifying which of those carry cultural-resource or infrastructure sensitivity — before a project is scoped and funded — is largely manual. A missed signal becomes a §6E-42 surprise after the budget is set.

A public process also needs its reasoning to be auditable. A risk read that cannot show its sources is hard to defend.

One read for one parcel, or a screen across a pipeline.

KILO returns a parcel-level infrastructure and cultural-resource risk read, with a confidence breakdown, in seconds — and the same engine runs across a batch of parcels. Use it to triage a CIP pipeline, screen an acquisition list, or flag the parcels in a permit queue that warrant early SHPD coordination.

Every conclusion is traced to a published source — Hawaiʻi Statewide GIS, USDA soils, FEMA, DOH, the HCPT inventory. Nothing is a black box; the reasoning is reviewable.

A pre-consultation screen, not a substitute for review.

KILO surfaces the regulatory cascade a parcel triggers — HRS §6E-42 review, the TOD-specific §6E-42(d) and (h) pathways added by Act 160 (2025), SMA and conservation-district requirements — so an agency can anticipate the process rather than discover it. It does not replace SHPD review, agency consultation, or the Section 106 process for federal undertakings; it tells you, early, where those will be substantive.

By policy, KILO does not ingest, aggregate, or surface any data that localizes iwi kūpuna — from any source. It uses what records-holders publish; it does not rebuild what HRS §6E-43.5(f) requires them to redact.

Three steps, from one parcel to a pipeline.